Big Book Burn or Return Challenge!

Big Book Burn and Return Challenge

This November my friend Jason Bartley posted a video on YouTube challenging people to either return their Alcoholics Anonymous Big Book to the organization or burn their Big Book if they prefer.  Similar to the “ice bucket challenge” which went viral many moons ago, the Big Book Burn and Return Challenge urges anyone (current members, former members, concerned citizens) who finds the book outdated, sexist, full of misinformation, religious abuse, and psychological damaging material to speak out and, hopefully, to change our country’s heavy reliance on 12-Step programs.

Since 1935, AA has had a monopoly on serving the population suffering with drinking problems.  For decades there seemed to be no other way because AA had become the “norm” for treating alcoholism.  Not only did AA become the norm, it did so without ever providing documented proof that AA works; providing no statistics; providing no new updates or information which could make their approach more efficient.  AA has relied on personal testimony alone to affirm that it works “if you work it.”  The only doctor who gave AA the thumbs up in the Big Book was Dr. Silkworth back in the 1930s; the Big Book was first published in 1939 and has not changed since.

Three damning facts you will not find in the AA Big Book are:

The 164 pages of the Big Book outline the “program” of Alcoholics Anonymous in the viewpoint of recovering men.   In overt sexist fashion, women are conditioned by other women in the rooms to read the book while trying to ignore and look past the male-oriented nouns and pronouns.  Women must overlook the historically backwards references about women where they are called nags, killjoys, wet blankets, and definitely should not wear the family trousers.

Some material in the Big Book is so old-fashioned it is beyond being relevant to recovering from addiction to alcohol.   Most of the material should either be removed completely or at least rewritten to reflect its relevance to alcoholism.  Instead, the book’s chapters incite frustration, depression, and controversy.  A chapter to the Agnostics?  A chapter to the wives of alcoholics?  Paragraphs insisting anger will kill you so you must get rid of every angry emotion in order to live?  Let me list a handful of AA’s Big Book’s “advice” along with facts which prove the book to be erroneous.

1.) His wife is one of those persons who really feels there is something rather sinful about these commodities, so she nagged, and her intolerance finally threw him into a fit of anger. (BB The Family Afterward, p. 135.)

THE FACT IS:  Just observing this sentence shows the attitudes of the 1930s towards women and wives.  Blaming the wife’s dislike of his drinking for creating his fit of anger (or rage) illustrates the AA philosophy that the alcoholic’s spouse is part of the problem.  Hence, Al-Anon.  Back then, people who end up in bad marriages did all they could not to get divorced.  Instead, in the 1930s, a husband who didn’t get along with his wife may have begun drinking excessively to put up with being married to the wrong person.  This sexism, however, is glaringly obvious.  Her nagging made him upset.  God forbid a wife have an opinion!  The cycle of spousal abuse shows that the victimized spouse will blame her husband’s drinking on herself.

2.) If we were to live, we had to free of anger. (BB How it Works, p.66.)

THE FACT IS: “People who are targets of anger in these studies will say things like, ‘I really understand the other person much better now–I guess I wasn’t listening before,'” comments (Dr. Howard) Kassinove. “While assertive expression is always preferable to angry expression, anger may serve an important alerting function that leads to deeper understanding of the other person and the problem.”  No one can be free of anger completely, it is unhealthy according to the American Psychological Association.

3.) Rather vain of us, wasn’t it? (BB, We Agnostics, p.49.) [From one of many paragraphs addressing those who do not believe in God: BB We Agnostics, p.49   Instead of regarding ourselves as intelligent agents, spearheads of God’s ever advancing Creation, we agnostics and atheists chose to believe that our human intelligence was the last word, the alpha and the omega, the beginning and end of all. ~BB We Agnostics p.49~]

THE FACT IS: This chapter is telling agnostics and atheists they are egotistical and vain.  Thus, implying that believers are humble and modest.  Although AA claims atheists can work the program this chapter definitely states they must convert to a belief of some kind, with an emphasis on God being the preferable choice.  However, science proves that religious people can be the meanest drunks.  Recently, it was proven that religiously instructed children are mean, too.  Logic dictates then that it is the believer, not the non-believer, who is being vain.

In summation, the Big Book plants the notion that sexism and spousal abuse are appropriate behaviors for both active alcoholics and those in recovery; that you can never be angry or you will die; that religious people are better than others.   I could go on and on but I’m going to keep this blog short today.  If you want to participate in the Big Book Burn and Return Challenge all you need to do is make a short video, share it on social media, and tag 3 of your friends to participate.  Feel free to use the examples I provide above as information for your video.  Leave your video links in the comments below too, would love to see how creative all you can be!

Please use these hashtags so we can find your video!  #BigBookBurnChallenge or #BigBookBurn

 

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Big Book Burn or Return Challenge!

  1. People involved in the sustaining the membership are not really contributors or benefactors, but a commodity used by the higher platform to further a subjective belief, and as a conduit of cash flow and recruitment of fresher sources of the commodity itself.
    This human commodity furthers the goals of the higher structure in encouraging the buying of books and the use of services of a product no one improves, accepted without question, free from product liability and from dated material. Very little money or time is spent on research and development and no profit sharing at the local meeting level where the primary purpose of the higher structure is actualize.
    The higher structure and supporting commodity are bound together, not from success of the product result, but by the anchoring of the belief to a symbol, in this case a book. When held in the hands of the commodity, this symbol creates a defining anonymous identity of a unifying virtue for the commodity and of course, profit for the corporate structure. However, unity and anonymity is only at the sole discretion of the corporate entity and discarded at the first hint of trouble or plausible threat to the income source. The human commodity becomes expendable in the best interest and convenience of the corporate structure and jettisoned in a doctrine of clean hands.

  2. That’s a very analytical reply, wow, where to begin… I think this Big Book Burn is an exercise in expressing our true feelings in a creative, outspoken, visual way. I am hopeful in time there will be planned protests organized publicly but that will take a lot of work and dedication to gather the masses to participate in something that large of scope. I really don’t think AA members understand they’re pawns in a game they don’t control, there is no upside down pyramid, it’s really an illusion created to make them think they’re in charge. They’re not. If members could think freely, the Big Book would have been in history vault and a new, informative version would be used today.

  3. No question, there is a transition in progress. If the membership was as open and honest as you are, not cowering to criticism and ridicule, the transition would been homegrown instead of having to be imported from outside.

  4. Book burners have a very long and well-honored history. Glad to see that you’ve joined them, I’m sure you’ll be welcomed.

    • There has been a long storied history of abuse scandals in Alcoholics Anonymous, also, so I’d rather be on this side of history than the opposite side. A sexist book with twisted morality has no place in the healthcare industry in the guise of “addiction treatment” and expensive rehab stays peddling “free 12-Step” meetings while raking in tens of thousands of dollars per rehab-patient. Nor do I want to be on the side of history where courts routinely coerce religion unto DUI offenders, or who knowingly send violent or sex offenders to AA meetings. Nor will I agree with an open-door policy in AA which is a magnet for predators to attend to seek out vulnerable people looking for help only to get harmed. Is this what you stand for, findley?

  5. Let’s look at the long storied history of book burners and take a peek at the previous occasions when people like yourself have taken such an action. Dating from the 7th century B.C. people have occasionally destroyed the written word for purposes censorship or cultural intolerance. Popular in the 15th century was burning the Quran by leaders of the inquisition, and the ever-popular Nazi book burnings of the ’30s, which were as symbolic as they were futile.

    With society moving away from the written page, people like yourself have had to adjust to new technologies. Public destruction of records, CDs and videos has become as commonplace, and throwbacks to the old days like Terry Jones’ 2010 Quran burning and your crowd have become less frequent.

    But it is good that the technique is not completely lost to history.

    Nice that your fellows have sent a few up in smoke now. You’ve surely caused some of the long departed to smile in agreement and delight. And now that your course is set, you only have 4-5 million more copies left to go in your crusade to make whatever point it is that you imagine you’re making by falling in line with the book burners of history.

    Very odd company for someone to choose to keep though, I must say.

    • Censoring or burning a book that’s psychologically damaging should be applauded and venerated. Sparing one person from reading a psychologically damaging book is a noble deed. Nice try with roping this into the book burning that was meant to keep GOOD things away from people, when this one is about keeping BAD things away from people.

  6. Well said, right in line with each episode. “Copies of this must be incinerated, for the good of humanity.” But not all have been whacko nutcases in these matters. One fellow observed “Where they burn books, they will ultimately burn people.” Sad to report that the book burners got a hold of all they could find of his written material…and burned it. Often the book burners have no real idea regarding the material they destroy, or the value it may hold to others. The Spaniards could not decypher the works of the Mayans, but believed they were damaging anyway, and despite the distress it caused the natives accomplished their noble deed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s